The Enforcement of Adjudicators’ Awards under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996: Part 3 of 2018
Kenneth T. Salmon and Katy Ormston
This article forms Part 3 of the series of articles continuing the reporting and review of cases on the enforcement of adjudicators’ awards begun in the Journal of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.
[flippingbook lightbox=”true” width=”740px” height=”480px” title=”Construction Case Update – Adjudication – Part 3 of 2018″]https://online.flippingbook.com/view/103760/[/flippingbook]
This document is available to be read on full screen or alternatively can be downloaded or printed using the icons at the bottom of the publication.
This Part 3 reports on the following developments and cases:
Victory House General Partner Ltd, Re company  EWHC 1143 (Ch) Morgan J.
Enforcement of judgment debt based on adjudicator’s decision—use of winding up petition
Pentland Investments Limited v Aitken Turnbull Architects Limited  SC EDIN 16.
Jurisdiction – Correct interpretation of the Scottish Scheme
(1) M Hart Construction Ltd and (2) P K Maintenance Ltd v Ideal Response Group Ltd  EWHC 314 (TCC) Jefford J., DBE, 7 March 2018.
Jurisdiction—disputed oral novation—effect of misdescription in adjudication notices
Dacy Building Services Ltd v IDM Properties LLP  EWHC 178 (TCC).
Gosvenor London Ltd v Aygun Aluminium Ltd  EWHC 227 (TCC) Fraser J., 28 March 2018.
Stay of execution—effect of allegation of fraud— addition of new (g) to the Wimbledon factors
Energo A.S. v Bester Generacion UK Ltd  EWHC 1127 (TCC) Stuart-Smith J., 13 April 2018.
Stay of execution—financial position of both parties